Future diplomats gathered at Belgorod State University for three days of intensive work, tackling issues such as preventing genocide, regulating armed drones, and protecting human rights in Africa.
The Belgorod International Model United Nations took place for the 14th time at Belgorod National Research University (BelSU), organised by the university’s International Diplomacy Club. This year, the model expanded its horizons – in addition to its usual formats, a section of the Human Rights Council opened its work in French, highlighting participants’ commitment to intercultural dialogue and linguistic diversity.
Three committees engaged in exciting and demanding work over the three days.
The Third Committee of the General Assembly took on a complex and historically significant agenda: “Preventing the Crime of Genocide in the 21st Century.” Delegates analysed the tragic lessons of the past and proposed modern legal and monitoring mechanisms to prevent future atrocities.
The Security Council debated intensely on a technologically challenging issue – for the first time in the history of the Belgorod model, the topic was “Regulating the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Modern Armed Conflicts.” Young diplomats discussed the limits of acceptability, civilian protection, and the new ethical challenges posed by the rapid development of military technology.
The Human Rights Council, meeting in French, addressed the equally pressing issue of coups d’état in Africa and the resulting human rights violations. The lively participation and the use of a foreign language confirmed the openness of the model movement.
Following the sessions, each committee developed and adopted resolutions, and the best delegates received nominations and awards. Anastasia Lisiih, Secretary‑General of the model, summed up the results, noting the special atmosphere of continuity that prevailed throughout the event. Alongside experienced modellers, newcomers were taking their first steps in diplomacy, and it was this combination of experience and fresh perspective that enabled a deep understanding of the issues.
General Assembly delegates shared which resolution points had been the most challenging. “Working on the twentieth amendment was quite difficult, as it required specifying certain indicators and their mechanisms. It was precise work that demanded attention to detail,” said a delegate representing Myanmar. A delegate from Russia added that finding legal instruments to prevent genocide in the digital environment presented particular challenges.
The 14th Belgorod International Model UN reaffirmed its status as one of the region’s key diplomatic youth platforms and demonstrated the willingness of representatives from different generations to discuss complex topics in each other’s languages.| << Back to the list |